Defensive Medicine: Evidence from Military Immunity
We estimate the extent of defensive medicine by physicians, embracing the no-liability counterfactual made possible by the structure of liability rules in the Military Heath System. Active-duty patients seeking treatment from military facilities cannot sue for harms resulting from negligent care, while protections are provided to dependents treated at military facilities and to all patients—active-duty or not—that receive care from civilian facilities. Drawing on this variation and exploiting exogenous shocks to care location choices stemming from base-hospital closures, we find suggestive evidence that liability immunity reduces inpatient spending by 5% with no measurable negative effect on patient outcomes.
Non-Technical Summaries
- Spending on patients in the U.S. Military Health System who are treated in settings that preclude suits against providers is about 5...
Published Versions
Michael Frakes & Jonathan Gruber, 2019. "Defensive Medicine: Evidence from Military Immunity," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, vol 11(3), pages 197-231.