Estimating the Effect of Training on Employment and Unemployment Durations: Evidence From Experimental Data
Using data from a social experiment, we estimate the impact of training on the duration of employment and unemployment spells for AFDC recipients. Although an experimental design eliminates the need to construct a comparison group for this analysis, simple comparisons between the average durations or the transition rates of treatments' and controls' employment and unemployment spells lead to biased estimates of the effects of training. We present and implement several econometric approaches that demonstrate the importance of and correct for these biases. For the training program studied in the paper, we find that it raised employment rates because employment durations increased. In contrast, training did not lead to shorter unemployment spells.
Published Versions
Published as "The Effect of Sample Selection and Initial Conditions in Duration Models: Evidence from Experimental Data on Training", Econometrica Vol. 64 (1), 1996, pp. 175-205.
With Curtis Eberwin, published as "The Impact of Being Offered and Receiving Classroom Training on the Employment Histories of Disadvantaged Women", Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 64, no. 221 (October 1997): 655-682.