Who Benefits from Meritocracy?
Working Paper 30113
DOI 10.3386/w30113
Issue Date
Revision Date
Individuals from lower-income backgrounds are underrepresented in high-status occupations. This underrepresentation has coincided with increasing scrutiny of the “meritocratic” criteria shaping access to these positions. We study the equity impacts of a prominent example of meritocratic selection: civil service exams. To do so, we use evidence from the Pendleton Act, a historical reform that introduced such exams to select U.S. federal employees. We find that, although the reform increased the representation of “educated outsiders” (individuals with high education but limited connections), it reduced the representation of lower-SES individuals. This reduction was stronger among applicants from states with high educational inequality.