Learning versus Unlearning: An Experiment on Retractions
Widely discredited ideas nevertheless persist. Why do we fail to “unlearn”? We study the effectiveness of retractions—the revoking of earlier information—in correcting beliefs. Our experimental design identifies belief updating from retractions— unlearning—and compares it to updating from equivalent new information—learning. Subjects do not fully unlearn from retractions and update approximately one-third less from retractions versus new information. Although we document several well-known biases in belief updating, our results require an explanation that treats retractions as intrinsically different. We find evidence for one such mechanism, while ruling out several others: retractions are more complex than direct information.
-
-
Copy CitationDuarte Gonçalves, Jonathan Libgober, and Jack Willis, "Learning versus Unlearning: An Experiment on Retractions," NBER Working Paper 29512 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3386/w29512.
-
Related
Programs
Working Groups
More from the NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.
