The 2000s Housing Cycle With 2020 Hindsight: A Neo-Kindlebergerian View
With “2020 hindsight,” the 2000s housing cycle is not a boom-bust but a boom-bust- rebound. Using a spatial equilibrium regression in which house prices are determined by income, amenities, urbanization, and supply, we show that long-run city-level fundamentals predict not only 1997-2019 price and rent growth but also the amplitude of the boom-bust-rebound. This evidence motivates our model of a cycle rooted in fundamentals. Households learn about fundamentals by observing “dividends” but become over-optimistic in the boom due to diagnostic expectations. A bust ensues when beliefs start to correct, exacerbated by a price-foreclosure spiral that drives prices below their long-run level. The rebound follows as prices converge to a path commensurate with higher fundamental growth. The estimated model explains the boom-bust-rebound with a single shock and accounts quantitatively for the dynamics of prices, rents, and foreclosures in cities with the largest cycles. We draw implications for asset cycles more generally.
Published Versions
Gabriel Chodorow-Reich & Adam M Guren & Timothy J McQuade, 2024. "The 2000s Housing Cycle with 2020 Hindsight: A Neo-Kindlebergerian View," Review of Economic Studies, vol 91(2), pages 785-816. citation courtesy of