Patenting Inventions or Inventing Patents? Continuation Practice at the USPTO
Continuations allow inventors to add new claims to old patents, leading to concerns about inadvertent infringement and holdup. We study the use of continuations to obtain standard essential patents (SEPs), a setting where patents are easily linked to possibly infringing technology. Continuation filings increase after standard publication. This effect is larger when patent examiners are more lenient, and for applicants with licensing-based business models. Claims of SEPs also become more similar after standard publication, and late claiming is positively correlated with litigation. Our findings suggest widespread use of continuations to “invent patents” that are infringed by already-published standards.
Published Versions
Cesare Righi & Tim Simcoe, 2021. "Patenting Inventions or Inventing Patents? Strategic Use of Continuations at the USPTO," Academy of Management Proceedings, vol 2021(1).
Cesare Righi & Timothy Simcoe, 2023. "Patenting inventions or inventing patents? Continuation practice at the USPTO," The RAND Journal of Economics, vol 54(3), pages 416-442.
More from NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Retirement and Disability, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.
