Win Some Lose Some? Evidence from a Randomized Microcredit Program Placement Experiment by Compartamos Banco
    Working Paper 19119
  
        
    DOI 10.3386/w19119
  
        
    Issue Date 
  
          Theory and evidence have raised concerns that microcredit does more harm than good, particularly when offered at high interest rates. We use a clustered randomized trial, and household surveys of eligible borrowers and their businesses, to estimate impacts from an expansion of group lending at 110% APR by the largest microlender in Mexico. Average effects on a rich set of outcomes measured 18-34 months post-expansion suggest some good and little harm. Other estimators identify heterogeneous treatment effects and effects on outcome distributions, but again yield little support for the hypothesis that microcredit causes harm.
- 
        
 - 
      Copy CitationManuela Angelucci, Dean Karlan, and Jonathan Zinman, "Win Some Lose Some? Evidence from a Randomized Microcredit Program Placement Experiment by Compartamos Banco," NBER Working Paper 19119 (2013), https://doi.org/10.3386/w19119.