Investment and Value: A Neoclassical Benchmark
    Working Paper 13866
  
        
    DOI 10.3386/w13866
  
        
    Issue Date 
  
          Which investment model best fits firm-level data? To answer this question we estimate alternative models using Compustat data. Surprisingly, the two best-performing specifications are based on Hayashi's (1982) model. This model's foremost implication, that Q is a sufficient statistic for determining a firm's investment decision, has been often rejected because cash-flow and lagged-investment effects are present in investment regressions. However, we find that these regression results are quite fragile and ineffectual for evaluating model performance. So, forget what investment regressions tell you. Models based on Hayashi (1982) provide a very good description of investment behavior at the firm level.
- 
        
 - 
      Copy CitationJanice Eberly, Sergio Rebelo, and Nicolas Vincent, "Investment and Value: A Neoclassical Benchmark," NBER Working Paper 13866 (2008), https://doi.org/10.3386/w13866.